Petition Against Encryption Backdoors Surpasses 70% of Target

In April of 2016, an anti-encryption law was put forward by US government officials, forcing encryption protocols to contain backdoors. A petition was started to get consumers and enterprises to vote against these proposals, and 70% of the petition’s goal has been reached so far.

More Outspoken Opinions Against Encryption Backdoors

It is positive to see more people care about encryption and privacy these days, even though it took a very invasive US government proposals to open people’s eyes. Said proposal would make end-to-end encryption illegal, and force companies and software providers to build a backdoor into their solutions for the government to access at will.

A lot of people have signed an online petition against this proposal, although there are still close to 30,000 signatures needed to get the number of required signatures. Consumers and enterprises need to start taking encryption more seriously and value the technology for what it allows us to achieve regarding secure communication.

Making end-to-end encryption is not the only objective of this proposal, though, as it would also directly undermine American’s privacy. Weakened encryption standards will attract even more criminals trying to breach the security protocols in place, and may lead to even more data breaches in the future. This should be avoided at all costs.

Related Post

Moreover, it would also make American companies less competitive in the market. If the world knows US software and hardware solutions contain backdoors for the government, consumers and enterprises will take their business elsewhere. However, they won’t take it to Japan, as the government is tracking GPS coordinates around the clock there already.

Last but not least, this proposal would lead to more censorship in the long run. If the government has backdoor access to all information, it is impossible to determine the validity of data in the future. Under the moniker of fighting terrorism, these new guidelines may make sense for government officials, but consumers and enterprises should make their voice be heard against this proposal and sign the petition.

Source: The Register UK

Images credit 1,2

If you liked this article follow us on Twitter @themerklenews and make sure to subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest bitcoin and altcoin price analysis and the latest cryptocurrency news.

JP Buntinx

JP Buntinx is a FinTech and Bitcoin enthusiast living in Belgium. His passion for finance and technology made him one of the world's leading freelance Bitcoin writers, and he aims to achieve the same level of respect in the FinTech sector.

Share
Published by
JP Buntinx

Recent Posts

Ethereum Names Its Post-Glamsterdam 2026 Upgrade: Hegota

Ethereum developers have officially named the network’s post-Glamsterdam 2026 upgrade Hegota. The name merges two…

2 days ago

TRON Integrates With Kalshi, Bringing TRX and USDT to the World’s Largest Prediction Market

TRON is pushing deeper into real-world financial infrastructure. TRON has announced that Kalshi, the world’s…

2 days ago

Former Pump.fun Developer Sentenced to Six Years After $2M SOL Heist

The “crypto Robin Hood” story has reached its legal end. A London court has sentenced…

2 days ago

NEAR Goes Live on Solana as Cross-Chain Trading and AI Ambitions Accelerate

$NEAR is now live on Solana. And the implications go far beyond a simple token…

3 days ago

Bitcoin Rips to $90K, Then Slips as Leverage and Supply Collide

Bitcoin moved fast. Then it pulled back just as quickly. A sudden surge pushed BTC…

3 days ago

Hyperliquid Proposes 37M HYPE Burn as Validators Prepare to Vote

Hyperliquid is facing one of its most consequential governance moments yet. A proposal now before…

3 days ago