New Senate Bill Aims To Restrict Tor Access For Illicit Activities

Saying how we live in a very strange world would be the understatement of the year. A new US Senate bill wants to ensure “bad people” can’t use solutions like Tor. Whether or not this means everyone else can keep using it, is anybody’s guess. For quite some time, everyone who used Tor was deemed to be an extremist.

Weeding Out The Bad Guys Using Tor

It becomes apparent from the outset government officials do not see eye to eye on matters regarding technology and privacy. Some people feel everyone who uses Tor is an extremist, whereas others just want to catch the bad guys using it. But US Congress has come up with a plan that should work for everyone. Or will it?

The new Senate bill making the rounds is somehow preventing bad people from using anonymity software such as Tor. The bill itself doesn’t make any specific mentions as to how this is to be achieved, making it seem like some parlor trick at best. It may be best not to let the imagination run too wild at this stage, albeit it is doubtful the technology used will respect user privacy.

It is rather interesting to see this particular bill focus its attention on Tor itself. For those who are unaware, the Tor project has been funded by the State Department. It appears as if Congress wants to tell the State Department how to spend their funding. This has not been confirmed at this time, though.



Related Post

Should this Senate bill pass, however, it is possible the State Department will face a restructuring of its funds. This may very well include only receiving funding for internet freedom once they ensure it is only used by people with no illicit intentions. Evaluating the risks and benefits of these tools should be the number one priority.

In the end, this is not good news for Tor users by any means. If the bill passes, the Senate will have a direct say in the development of this software, as they control the financial strings. If it does not pass, there will be other political attacks against the Tor project in the future. Cutting the funding for the project may not be an entirely bad thing,  though, as it would become a project “for the people, funded by the people’ in that case.

Image credit 1

If you liked this article follow us on Twitter @themerklenews and make sure to subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest bitcoin and altcoin price analysis and the latest cryptocurrency news.

JP Buntinx

JP Buntinx is a FinTech and Bitcoin enthusiast living in Belgium. His passion for finance and technology made him one of the world's leading freelance Bitcoin writers, and he aims to achieve the same level of respect in the FinTech sector.

Share
Published by
JP Buntinx

Recent Posts

Ethereum Names Its Post-Glamsterdam 2026 Upgrade: Hegota

Ethereum developers have officially named the network’s post-Glamsterdam 2026 upgrade Hegota. The name merges two…

2 days ago

TRON Integrates With Kalshi, Bringing TRX and USDT to the World’s Largest Prediction Market

TRON is pushing deeper into real-world financial infrastructure. TRON has announced that Kalshi, the world’s…

2 days ago

Former Pump.fun Developer Sentenced to Six Years After $2M SOL Heist

The “crypto Robin Hood” story has reached its legal end. A London court has sentenced…

2 days ago

NEAR Goes Live on Solana as Cross-Chain Trading and AI Ambitions Accelerate

$NEAR is now live on Solana. And the implications go far beyond a simple token…

3 days ago

Bitcoin Rips to $90K, Then Slips as Leverage and Supply Collide

Bitcoin moved fast. Then it pulled back just as quickly. A sudden surge pushed BTC…

3 days ago

Hyperliquid Proposes 37M HYPE Burn as Validators Prepare to Vote

Hyperliquid is facing one of its most consequential governance moments yet. A proposal now before…

4 days ago