FTC Settles Charges Against Bitcoin Mining Hardware Manufacturer Buttlefly Labs

Bitcoin mining hardware manufacturer Butterfly Labs, has agreed to settle a dispute with the FTC, which accused the company of deceiving customers. According to the FTC’s complaint – which was filed on the 18th of September in 2014 – Butterfly Labs misrepresented the profitability of their mining machines, and also kept customer’s pre-payments without delivering the mining hardware for an extend period of time.

According to an official press release on the FTC website, the settlement bars Butterfly Labs, and its owner Sonny Vleisides, from taking pre-payments for any bitcoin hardware that can not be delivered within 30 days. General manager of Butterfly Labs, Darla Drake, is also under the same constraints.

Jessica Rich, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, said that this settlement will ensure that the defendants will not be able to mislead customers in the future.

Under the settlement, Butterfly Labs will also be required to obtain permission from customers in the event of a late delivery.

“Both settlement orders in the case require the defendants to provide consumers with prompt refunds if they sell a damaged or defective product, and require defendants to obtain a consumer’s permission before delivering a product late.”

Although the court imposed monetary penalties of $38,615,161 against Butterfly Labs, the judgements have been suspended for the time being due to the inability of the defendants to pay them. Instead, a $15,000 payment is required of BL, and a $4000 payment is required of Sonny Vleisides.

Related Post

The $135,8878 judgement against Darla Drake – who used customer’s hardware to mine for herself – will be suspended once she returns the dollar equivalent of all the bitcoins that were mined with that hardware.

While the monetary penalties are suspended for the time being, the FTC has made it clear that the situation may change if any other evidence surfaces.

“The judgments were suspended based on the defendants’ inability to pay, but will become due should the defendants be found to have misrepresented their financial condition.”

 

Image credit: 1

If you liked this article follow us on Twitter @themerklenews and make sure to subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest bitcoin and altcoin price analysis and the latest cryptocurrency news.

Traderman

Avid blogger, entrepreneur, and cryptocurrency enthusiast. I love writing about cryptocurrency, NFTs, price analysis, and much more!

Share
Published by
Traderman

Recent Posts

Bitget Launches OpenAI Pre-IPO Access As Crypto Exchanges Push Into Tokenized Equity Markets

Bitget officially launched pre-IPO access to OpenAI via its IPO Prime platform which deepens their…

9 hours ago

Tether Expands Open-Source Push With New Developer Grants For AI And Payment Infrastructure

Tether's presence in decentralized tech space is growing due to the launch of its developer…

1 day ago

Huma Finance Exploit Hits Legacy Contracts As Platform Maintains Stability And Accelerates Transition To V2 System

While challenges remain, the decentralized finance sector is moving forward, and Huma Finance's exploit serves…

1 day ago

Chainlink Expands Cross-Chain Reach As Major Protocols And Institutions Deepen Adoption 

Chainlink is continuing its mission to be the most widely integrated infrastructure in crypto, adding…

2 days ago

Sui Network Hit Again: DeepBook Exploit Adds To Growing List As Token Defies Pressure With Bullish Breakout

A vulnerability in one of the core DeFi protocols on Sui Network exposes the ecosystem…

3 days ago

Polygon Raises Network Capacity To 140M Gas

Polygon has made a big move in cementing its mission as one of the leading…

4 days ago