Biometrics Privacy Rule Change Put On Ice In Illinois

Another victory is in the books for people who value encryption and privacy, as a plan to weaken biometric privacy has been put on ice. This proposal was initially pitched by Illinois Senator Terry Link, as he wanted to collect more biometric data from consumers.for some unknown reason.

Biometrics Privacy Rules Will Not Be Weakened

Although the proposal was only filed yesterday morning, it did not take all that long for the bill to be put on hold. Who is responsible for this decision, or what the motive may have been, remains unknown. But in the end, all that matters is that

biometrics privacy rules will not be weakened in the state of Illinois. Doing otherwise would set a very dangerous precedent, to say the least.

This amendment had the potential to be pushed through the legislative process without too many problems. However, privacy advocates were very concerned about this proposal, and slipping in the bill without time for public debate is not acceptable. Decisions like these require the public to be informed before it should even be considered, yet

Senator Link had no intent of doing that.

What this amendment would do is undercut legal protections, and facial recognition would be exempted from the law. Some people might be wondering what this has to do with the state of Illinois specifically, but that has to do with a lawsuit filed against Facebook in the region. Three students claim the social media platform violated

Related Post
BIPA by scanning all faces in uploaded photos so friends could be tagged.

However, Facebook wanted to this lawsuit to be moved to California, which was granted, after which the company filed a motion to dismiss the case entirely, which was denied. Facebook amended its T&C in 2015 explaining these changes, which all users agreed with when they continued to use the social platform. Additionally, the terms also state how all cases against the company have to be litigated according to California law.

If the amendment by Senator Link has passed, any digital photo would no longer be protected from facial recognition scans by third parties. It seems this proposal was a way to try and hurt Facebook, as Link initially sponsored the BIPA proposal which is employed right now. It makes little sense to go in against something one has approved himself not too long ago.

Source: Ars Technica

Images credit 1,2

If you liked this article follow us on Twitter @themerklenews and make sure to subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest bitcoin and altcoin price analysis and the latest cryptocurrency news.

JP Buntinx

JP Buntinx is a FinTech and Bitcoin enthusiast living in Belgium. His passion for finance and technology made him one of the world's leading freelance Bitcoin writers, and he aims to achieve the same level of respect in the FinTech sector.

Share
Published by
JP Buntinx

Recent Posts

Anonymity vs. Transparency: BlockDAG’s Post-Forbes Dilemma

Anonymity vs. Transparency: Where Will BlockDAG Go After the Forbes Doxxing? The cryptocurrency market has…

31 mins ago

Top ICOs: BlockDAG, Dogeverse, 99BTC, WAI, eTukTuk & Others

Top 7 Crypto ICOs: BlockDAG’s Over $22M Presale Surge Outshines Dogeverse, 5thScape, WAI, 99BTC &…

6 hours ago

BlockDAG Revolution: Forbes Disclosure Propels It to New Heights

Forbes Disclosure Catalyzes BlockDAG Presale: Is This Crypto Innovation the Future or Just a Tech…

10 hours ago

BEFE Coin’s Surge: Leaving PEPE and SHIBA INU in the Shadows

BEFE Coin makes an ethereal entrance onto the crypto scene, surpassing mammoths in the scene,…

11 hours ago

Bitgert Coin’s Rally: What Lies Ahead for the Cryptocurrency This Week?

The crypto market is loaded up with various kinds of coins. Some wind up satisfying…

11 hours ago

BDAG X30 Rig Leads Polygon (MATIC) Price & PEPE Coin Potential

BlockDAG's X30 Home Mining Rig Dominates with $2.3M Miner Sales, Outruns Polygon (MATIC) Price, and…

1 day ago