Categories: CryptoNews

Smart Contracts May Need To Play By Dumb Rules

Smart contracts seem to become the norm these days, although there is an argument to be made as to how “smart” these contracts truly are. While there is a certain attribute of efficiency to be gained, there is the question of whether people can make these contracts behave as intended in the real world.

Enforcing a Contract to be Smart

That will be the biggest hurdle to overcome in the real world, as smart contracts can turn out to be complex layers upon one another. To most people, the intricacies of smart contracts are well above their pay grade, nor will they care as long as everything works as expected. But enforcing everything works as intended is a different matter altogether.

One way to solve this problem, according to Nigel Farmer, is to add metadata or a description to smart contracts, containing specific details to enforce the boundaries of this agreement. Additionally, the information will need to be validated independently to ensure the code will execute what is to be expected, and nothing else.

But there is another issue that will need to be addressed, as it’s hard to trust the creator or provider of the smart contract itself. Although this technology is designed to create a trustless ecosystem, in the long run, there is a likely chance smart contract issuer risk becomes a new “term” in the early days of adopting this concept.

Related Post

Moreover, will smart contracts play nice with existing systems and infrastructure? Legacy systems are not exactly known for being compatible with disruptive technology, and the gap between both infrastructures will need to be bridged in a convenient and cost-efficient manner. Otherwise, this technology will never be properly embraced by enterprises and governments.

Although smart contracts are designed to cut out the middleman of the agreement, there may be oversight needed in the early stages of embracing this technology. A contract with bad code hitting the blockchain could cause a lot of damage unless detection safeguards are put in place. It is always best to prevent than to cure, and developers have their work cut out for them.

Source: Software AG

Images credit 1,2

If you liked this article follow us on Twitter @themerklenews and make sure to subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest bitcoin and altcoin price analysis and the latest cryptocurrency news.

JP Buntinx

JP Buntinx is a FinTech and Bitcoin enthusiast living in Belgium. His passion for finance and technology made him one of the world's leading freelance Bitcoin writers, and he aims to achieve the same level of respect in the FinTech sector.

Share
Published by
JP Buntinx

Recent Posts

SEC Approves First Spot Chainlink ETF For U.S. Markets

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has approved Bitwise’s spot Chainlink ETF, marking the first…

3 days ago

Rumble And Tether Launch Integrated Self-Custodial Wallet

Rumble and Tether have officially launched the Rumble Wallet, a self-custodial crypto wallet integrated directly…

3 days ago

BNB Chain Sets Fermi Hard Fork For January 14 Upgrade

BNB Chain is preparing to activate its Fermi hard fork on January 14 at 2:30…

3 days ago

Ethereum Ends 2025 As The Financial And Coordination Layer Of The Internet

Ethereum closes 2025 having firmly established itself as the secure foundation for an expanding digital…

4 days ago

Solana Closes 2025 As A Revenue-Driven Blockchain

Solana ends 2025 as one of the few blockchain ecosystems where revenue, assets, and trading…

4 days ago

Morgan Stanley Enters Crypto ETF Race With Bitcoin And Solana Filings

Morgan Stanley has taken a decisive step into the regulated crypto investment market, filing its…

4 days ago