Categories: CryptoNews

Smart Contracts May Need To Play By Dumb Rules

Smart contracts seem to become the norm these days, although there is an argument to be made as to how “smart” these contracts truly are. While there is a certain attribute of efficiency to be gained, there is the question of whether people can make these contracts behave as intended in the real world.

Enforcing a Contract to be Smart

That will be the biggest hurdle to overcome in the real world, as smart contracts can turn out to be complex layers upon one another. To most people, the intricacies of smart contracts are well above their pay grade, nor will they care as long as everything works as expected. But enforcing everything works as intended is a different matter altogether.

One way to solve this problem, according to Nigel Farmer, is to add metadata or a description to smart contracts, containing specific details to enforce the boundaries of this agreement. Additionally, the information will need to be validated independently to ensure the code will execute what is to be expected, and nothing else.

But there is another issue that will need to be addressed, as it’s hard to trust the creator or provider of the smart contract itself. Although this technology is designed to create a trustless ecosystem, in the long run, there is a likely chance smart contract issuer risk becomes a new “term” in the early days of adopting this concept.

Related Post

Moreover, will smart contracts play nice with existing systems and infrastructure? Legacy systems are not exactly known for being compatible with disruptive technology, and the gap between both infrastructures will need to be bridged in a convenient and cost-efficient manner. Otherwise, this technology will never be properly embraced by enterprises and governments.

Although smart contracts are designed to cut out the middleman of the agreement, there may be oversight needed in the early stages of embracing this technology. A contract with bad code hitting the blockchain could cause a lot of damage unless detection safeguards are put in place. It is always best to prevent than to cure, and developers have their work cut out for them.

Source: Software AG

Images credit 1,2

If you liked this article follow us on Twitter @themerklenews and make sure to subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest bitcoin and altcoin price analysis and the latest cryptocurrency news.

JP Buntinx

JP Buntinx is a FinTech and Bitcoin enthusiast living in Belgium. His passion for finance and technology made him one of the world's leading freelance Bitcoin writers, and he aims to achieve the same level of respect in the FinTech sector.

Share
Published by
JP Buntinx

Recent Posts

Starknet Introduces STRK20 To Bring Built-In Privacy To ERC-20 Tokens

The team behind Starknet has introduced a new token standard aimed at solving one of…

3 days ago

Meta Acquires Moltbook, A Social Network Built For AI Agents To Interact And Coordinate

In a move that highlights the growing race to build infrastructure for autonomous artificial intelligence,…

3 days ago

Polymarket Partners With Palantir To Develop AI Platform For Sports Betting Integrity

Prediction market platform Polymarket has entered a new partnership with Palantir Technologies and artificial intelligence…

3 days ago

Ethereum Foundation Begins Staking Treasury ETH Using Bitwise Infrastructure

The Ethereum Foundation has begun staking part of its treasury, marking a significant step in…

4 days ago

Cyberconnect And SurfAI Founder Reportedly Under Investigation In China

Fresh reports circulating in the crypto space suggest that Wei Jiequan, better known as Wilson…

4 days ago

Virtuals And dAI Launch ERC-8183 To Enable Trustless Agentic Commerce On Ethereum

The infrastructure powering autonomous AI agents on Ethereum is slowly coming together. Payments, trust layers,…

4 days ago