Judge Throws Out PlayPen Evidence As FBI Refuses To Disclose Details

The story regarding the FBI hacking Tor to infect the PlayPen platform is not over just yet. A judge excluded the evidence presented by the law enforcement agency after they refused to detail how they hacked the website in the first place.

Not So Fast, FBI Hackers!

In an earlier article, we mentioned how the FBI did not plan to disclose their method for breaching Tor and unleashing malware on the PlayPen platform. According to the defense attorney, the method used by law enforcement could show they received unreliable information. Moreover, the are concerns the FBI went beyond the jurisdiction aspect of the warrant itself.

Judge Robert J. Bryan, who initially demanded the FBI reveal their hacking practices, declared the evidence invalid and excluded it from the case against Jay Michaud. This news comes as quite a surprise, considering the FBI had managed to get a judge to overrule that demand, and they did not have to disclose the method. 

Judge Robert J. Bryan stated:

“Evidence of the NIT, the search warrant issued based on the NIT, and the fruits of that warrant should be excluded and should not be offered in evidence at trial.”

Related Post

Whether or not this is due to mounting pressure by privacy advocates on how government hacking should not be used as evidence in court, remains to be seen. Such evidence raises a lot of questions regarding its validity, as well as where this trend will end up if law enforcement can get a warrant to hack anything and anyone.

Given the FBI’s stance on how presenting the method of their hack should not diminish the validity of the evidence, it remains strange they did not do so. Their Network Investigation Technique remains shrouded in mystery for the time being, yet the refusal to reveal details may lead to future cases being thrown out. Additionally, this may – or should – result in reinvestigating the methods used to arrest other deep web members over the past few years.

Rest assured the US government has already come up with a new proposal to address this issue, though. The US Senate is considering changing the federal judicial rules, which would let any judge sign warrants for law enforcement hacking purposes. In fact, those warrants would be useful for targeting computers outside their jurisdiction, such as any device running anonymity or privacy software.

Source: CNET

Images credit 1,2

If you liked this article follow us on Twitter @themerklenews and make sure to subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest bitcoin and altcoin price analysis and the latest cryptocurrency news.

JP Buntinx

JP Buntinx is a FinTech and Bitcoin enthusiast living in Belgium. His passion for finance and technology made him one of the world's leading freelance Bitcoin writers, and he aims to achieve the same level of respect in the FinTech sector.

Share
Published by
JP Buntinx

Recent Posts

Core Foundation Teams Up With Z Protocol To Expand Zcash

Core Foundation has just announced a new partnership with Z Protocol, and it’s already getting…

3 hours ago

Binance Wallet Moves Into Prediction Markets With PredictFun Integration

Binance Wallet is quietly stepping into one of crypto’s fastest-growing sectors, prediction markets. According to…

3 hours ago

CZ And Elon Musk Weigh In On Quantum Fears As Crypto Faces Uncertain But Inevitable Shift

As concerns around quantum computing and crypto security continue to build, Changpeng Zhao is stepping…

3 hours ago

Bitmine Expands Ethereum Holdings With Massive Weekly Accumulation And Strengthens Position As A Major Crypto Treasury Player

Bitmine Immersion Technologies, led by Tom Lee, is continuing to build aggressively on its Ethereum…

1 day ago

Ethereum Foundation Quietly Stakes Over $46 Million In ETH

Something interesting just played out within the Ethereum space, and it didn’t take long before…

1 day ago

Ethereum Is Still Leading The Tokenized Assets Space

It’s becoming more obvious by the day that Ethereum is not slowing down anytime soon,…

2 days ago