Categories: CryptoNews

IRS Urged To Clarify Bitcoin Taxation Guidelines

Taxation of Bitcoin is always a topic of substantial debate, as it would require cryptocurrency to be labeled as money or currency. Over the in the US, that debacle may finally see a solution as the CPA is pushing the IRS for guidance on how Bitcoin taxation should be handled moving forward.

Taxation is Theft, But The IRS Thinks Otherwise

Consumers and investors in the United States would like some clarifications to how they should look at Bitcoin taxation. Right now, there is no specific tax treatment of cryptocurrency in place in the US, and it rather concerns for tax professionals. Clarification would be a positive thing, albeit cryptocurrency enthusiasts may argue there should be no tax on Bitcoin to begin with.

It is not the first time discussions regarding Bitcoin taxation in the US pop up. The IRS had unveiled a plan to tax cryptocurrency over two years ago, yet very little has been undertaken ever since. Moreover, their ruling of seeing Bitcoin as property did not sit well with most holders, as they would have to report losses and gains themselves for every single Satoshi.

A lot of people use Bitcoin on an everyday basis, and it is unclear as to how taxation works in this regard. Additionally, the everyday consumer may have some difficulty when determining which lot of coins was used during particular transactions. It is quite a hassle to figure out these details, and the average tax professional will have an even harder time doing so.

Related Post

But other questions need to be answered as well. For example, how should users determine the market value of Bitcoin at the time of the transaction? Should they use an average price index or the local exchange rate value? Proving this will be an even bigger challenge as hardly anyone screenshots every transaction taking place with its associated fiat currency value at that time.

There is also the topic of funds controlled by merchants to take into account. Charitable organizations have to adhere to taxation guidelines as well, although the regulation is not clear in this regard either. In the end, there is a lot of explaining to do by the IS, yet it remains to be seen if and they decide to do so.

Source: Scribd

Images credit 1,2

If you liked this article follow us on Twitter @themerklenews and make sure to subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest bitcoin and altcoin price analysis and the latest cryptocurrency news.

JP Buntinx

JP Buntinx is a FinTech and Bitcoin enthusiast living in Belgium. His passion for finance and technology made him one of the world's leading freelance Bitcoin writers, and he aims to achieve the same level of respect in the FinTech sector.

Share
Published by
JP Buntinx

Recent Posts

Bitwise Launches Its First Tokenized Fund With $259M in Assets and 4% Annual Yield

Bitwise Asset Management has just made its first move into tokenized funds, and it comes…

12 hours ago

Binance Launches US Stocks and ETFs Trading for Non-US Users With Zero Commission

Binance just made a move that blurs the line between crypto exchange and traditional brokerage…

13 hours ago

NEAR Protocol Ships Confidential Payments, Crosses $19B in Intents Volume, and Partners With Bermuda Government

NEAR Protocol has had a month that most blockchain projects would stretch across an entire…

1 day ago

Chainlink Records 7 New Integrations Across 6 Services and 4 Chains

Something is becoming increasingly clear about Chainlink, the integrations are not slowing down. The protocol…

1 day ago

Circle Freezes $12.6 Million in Zama’s Confidential USDC Contract on Ethereum

Blockchain investigator ZachXBT has flagged a major stablecoin freeze that is sending shockwaves through the…

3 days ago

Exponent Finance Launches V2 To Expand Institutional Yield Markets On Solana

From a primarily interest rate swap niche product, Exponent has developed into an onchain capital…

3 days ago