Categories: CryptoNews

IRS Urged To Clarify Bitcoin Taxation Guidelines

Taxation of Bitcoin is always a topic of substantial debate, as it would require cryptocurrency to be labeled as money or currency. Over the in the US, that debacle may finally see a solution as the CPA is pushing the IRS for guidance on how Bitcoin taxation should be handled moving forward.

Taxation is Theft, But The IRS Thinks Otherwise

Consumers and investors in the United States would like some clarifications to how they should look at Bitcoin taxation. Right now, there is no specific tax treatment of cryptocurrency in place in the US, and it rather concerns for tax professionals. Clarification would be a positive thing, albeit cryptocurrency enthusiasts may argue there should be no tax on Bitcoin to begin with.

It is not the first time discussions regarding Bitcoin taxation in the US pop up. The IRS had unveiled a plan to tax cryptocurrency over two years ago, yet very little has been undertaken ever since. Moreover, their ruling of seeing Bitcoin as property did not sit well with most holders, as they would have to report losses and gains themselves for every single Satoshi.

A lot of people use Bitcoin on an everyday basis, and it is unclear as to how taxation works in this regard. Additionally, the everyday consumer may have some difficulty when determining which lot of coins was used during particular transactions. It is quite a hassle to figure out these details, and the average tax professional will have an even harder time doing so.

Related Post

But other questions need to be answered as well. For example, how should users determine the market value of Bitcoin at the time of the transaction? Should they use an average price index or the local exchange rate value? Proving this will be an even bigger challenge as hardly anyone screenshots every transaction taking place with its associated fiat currency value at that time.

There is also the topic of funds controlled by merchants to take into account. Charitable organizations have to adhere to taxation guidelines as well, although the regulation is not clear in this regard either. In the end, there is a lot of explaining to do by the IS, yet it remains to be seen if and they decide to do so.

Source: Scribd

Images credit 1,2

If you liked this article follow us on Twitter @themerklenews and make sure to subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest bitcoin and altcoin price analysis and the latest cryptocurrency news.

JP Buntinx

JP Buntinx is a FinTech and Bitcoin enthusiast living in Belgium. His passion for finance and technology made him one of the world's leading freelance Bitcoin writers, and he aims to achieve the same level of respect in the FinTech sector.

Share
Published by
JP Buntinx

Recent Posts

Hyperliquid Proposes 37M HYPE Burn as Validators Prepare to Vote

Hyperliquid is facing one of its most consequential governance moments yet. A proposal now before…

1 day ago

Tether Introduces PearPass, a Local-First Password Manager With No Servers

Tether has entered a new category. The company announced the launch of PearPass, a peer-to-peer…

1 day ago

Solana Takes First Steps Toward Quantum-Resistant Security

The Solana ecosystem is beginning to prepare for a future many in crypto still treat…

2 days ago

Institutional Bitcoin Accumulation Enters a New Phase

Bitcoin accumulation is no longer subtle. It’s visible. It’s deliberate. And it’s accelerating. In the…

2 days ago

Ripple Expands RLUSD to Layer 2 Networks, Laying the Groundwork for Institutional DeFi

Ripple is pushing its stablecoin strategy beyond a single chain. The company has announced it…

2 days ago

Standard Chartered and Coinbase Deepen Institutional Crypto Partnership

Standard Chartered and Coinbase are pushing their institutional crypto relationship into a new phase. On…

3 days ago