Categories: CryptoNews

Alibabacoin’s Piggybacking Tactic Results in a Trademark Lawsuit

In the world of cryptocurrency, there are quite a few projects which will find themselves in legal trouble sooner or later. This is especially true when such projects use the name of a person, brand, or company in an effort to gain more legitimacy. For Alibabacoin, it seems the end is near.

Alibabacoin is in the hot Seat

When Alibabacoin was first introduced, people immediately knew things would implode at some point. It seems now is that point, as Alibaba has filed a trademark lawsuit against the Dubai-based firm that created it. It’s an unsurprising turn of events, as Alibabacoin has nothing to do with the e-commerce giant. Nor is the Dubai firm allowed to use the term Alibaba, as it is already trademarked.

To put all of this into perspective, Alibabacoin was created some time ago. It is also known as the ABBC Foundation and is seemingly trying to make an impact in the world of cryptocurrency. Whether or not it chose a controversial name on purpose or simply thought it would not constitute trademark infringement remains to be seen. However, it is evident the company will have a lot of explaining to do in this regard.

According to the lawsuit, the firm or its legal team will have the opportunity to explain themselves in front of a US district court on April 11. Depending on how that pans out, the Dubai company may face additional charges for other infringements.

Related Post

Additionally, the lawsuit seeks to prevent further infringements as well as obtain compensatory, punitive, and triple damages for alleged violations of the law. Exact dollar amounts are unknown for the time being, but this lawsuit is probably the nail in the coffin for Alibabacoin. 

Indeed, Alibabacoin is seemingly intent on capitalizing on the success of Alibaba, despite not having any ties to the company. Moreover, it has used Alibaba’s trademarks in “countless instances” to sell its native cryptocurrency. Although it is not the first time we’ve seen currencies like these be created, it is one of the few times when the trademark’s owner has decided to take matters to court.

Considering that this currency was making people believe Alibaba had a stake in cryptocurrencies, it is only normal that the confusion was becoming a bit too problematic. Alibaba has stated that it wants nothing to do with cryptocurrency, and it is evident not much will change in that regard. At the same time, Alibabacoin’s team had plenty of time to rebrand or make it clear they were not associated with the e-commerce giant. For some reason, they decided not to do so.

JP Buntinx

JP Buntinx is a FinTech and Bitcoin enthusiast living in Belgium. His passion for finance and technology made him one of the world's leading freelance Bitcoin writers, and he aims to achieve the same level of respect in the FinTech sector.

Share
Published by
JP Buntinx

Recent Posts

Solana’s Wild Week: Price Plunge, Institutional Moves, and Resilient Ecosystem Growth

The past week has been turbulent for Solana (SOL), containing several elements that together cut…

2 days ago

Tether Ramps Up Minting on Tron as Another 1 Billion USDT Hits the Market

Tether has stirred things up in the crypto market once again. The first is that…

2 days ago

Whale dumps 5M $VIRTUAL after massive losses — $8.4M down in two failed bets

A prominent entity in the $VIRTUAL space has vacated their position in the asset, netting…

2 days ago

$RFC Soars to 8th Largest Pumpfun Memecoin as Holder Base Grows by Nearly 30% in Just Two Weeks

$RFC (RFindercoin) has achieved an important milestone in the memecoin world: It's now the 8th…

3 days ago

Memecoin Market Sees Positive Net Inflow as Smart Money Backs Fartcoin and Other Tokens

On April 7, 2025, activity in the memecoin market among smart money took a sharp…

3 days ago

Curve Finance’s Michael Egorov Resumes $CRV Selloff as Smart Money Flocks to Ethereum

While the wider world of cryptocurrency is in recovery, Michael Egorov, the founder of Curve…

3 days ago