Categories: CryptoNews

Alibabacoin’s Piggybacking Tactic Results in a Trademark Lawsuit

In the world of cryptocurrency, there are quite a few projects which will find themselves in legal trouble sooner or later. This is especially true when such projects use the name of a person, brand, or company in an effort to gain more legitimacy. For Alibabacoin, it seems the end is near.

Alibabacoin is in the hot Seat

When Alibabacoin was first introduced, people immediately knew things would implode at some point. It seems now is that point, as Alibaba has filed a trademark lawsuit against the Dubai-based firm that created it. It’s an unsurprising turn of events, as Alibabacoin has nothing to do with the e-commerce giant. Nor is the Dubai firm allowed to use the term Alibaba, as it is already trademarked.

To put all of this into perspective, Alibabacoin was created some time ago. It is also known as the ABBC Foundation and is seemingly trying to make an impact in the world of cryptocurrency. Whether or not it chose a controversial name on purpose or simply thought it would not constitute trademark infringement remains to be seen. However, it is evident the company will have a lot of explaining to do in this regard.

According to the lawsuit, the firm or its legal team will have the opportunity to explain themselves in front of a US district court on April 11. Depending on how that pans out, the Dubai company may face additional charges for other infringements.

Related Post

Additionally, the lawsuit seeks to prevent further infringements as well as obtain compensatory, punitive, and triple damages for alleged violations of the law. Exact dollar amounts are unknown for the time being, but this lawsuit is probably the nail in the coffin for Alibabacoin. 

Indeed, Alibabacoin is seemingly intent on capitalizing on the success of Alibaba, despite not having any ties to the company. Moreover, it has used Alibaba’s trademarks in “countless instances” to sell its native cryptocurrency. Although it is not the first time we’ve seen currencies like these be created, it is one of the few times when the trademark’s owner has decided to take matters to court.

Considering that this currency was making people believe Alibaba had a stake in cryptocurrencies, it is only normal that the confusion was becoming a bit too problematic. Alibaba has stated that it wants nothing to do with cryptocurrency, and it is evident not much will change in that regard. At the same time, Alibabacoin’s team had plenty of time to rebrand or make it clear they were not associated with the e-commerce giant. For some reason, they decided not to do so.

JP Buntinx

JP Buntinx is a FinTech and Bitcoin enthusiast living in Belgium. His passion for finance and technology made him one of the world's leading freelance Bitcoin writers, and he aims to achieve the same level of respect in the FinTech sector.

Share
Published by
JP Buntinx

Recent Posts

Whale Loses $612K In Ninth PEPE Trading Cycle Despite $2.42M Gains In Earlier Waves

A whale known for trading PEPE tokens recently ended the ninth wave of their trading…

1 hour ago

Chainlink’s Build And Scale Programs Shine In 2024 As Whale Activity Sparks Market Buzz

2024 has been a transformative year for Chainlink, with remarkable strides made through its Build…

1 hour ago

Crypto Trends: Pudgy Penguins, Ripple’s RLUSD, And Bitcoin’s Record-Breaking Rally

The crypto space is abuzz with significant developments across NFTs, stablecoins, and Bitcoin’s historic performance.…

1 hour ago

Tether Powers Market Momentum As MiCA Deadline Approaches

Tether has been a driving force in the ongoing crypto bull rally, with an average…

1 hour ago

Ethereum Shows Strong Conviction As Long-Term Holders Ramp Up Accumulation

Long-term holders of Ethereum (ETH) have demonstrated unwavering conviction in 2024, with their collective holdings…

1 hour ago

$PENGU Drops 52% Post-Airdrop: What Are Top Claimants Doing With Their Tokens? 

The price of $PENGU has plummeted by over 50% from its all-time high (ATH) in…

1 hour ago