Categories: CryptoNews

When Do Bitcoin Blocks Justify Higher Transaction Fees?

Ever since the Bitcoin block size debate began many moons ago, there has been a lot of discussion as to whether or not bigger block sizes even matter. Some people fee the transaction fee is more important, and low fees seem to justify smaller blocks. But is it that simple, or is there more to this debate?

Blocks Vs. Fees – Which Matters In The End?

As the Bitcoin blocks get filled up with transactions, users would pay a higher fee to get transactions confirmed quicker. However, as long as the fees remain low, there seems no apparent need for a bigger block size. But predicting the current fee, as well as the block size, is not as easy as one might think.

At the same time, it is important to keep in mind the fee will not automatically increase if there is significant network congestions. A lot of people may wait until the “busy lines” are open again unless their transaction has to be sent right away. For the time being, the average Bitcoin transaction fee is US$0.05, which is still a lot lower than just about any other form of payment in existence today.

The major problem occurs when the fees start to multiply, and efforts such as the Lightning Network should prevent this from happening. A block increase through the Bitcoin Core client could alleviate a lot of the stress as well. A solution that would scale on-demand seems to be the best option moving forward, albeit it is much easier to say so than actually getting the code written and compiled.

Related Post

One thing to keep in mind is how it is rather “cheap” to fill up Bitcoin network blocks with automated small transactions, whereas effectively gaming transaction fees is quite a challenge. In fact, it would not be economically viable to start floating the transaction price, as it would be rather expensive to do so.

Depending on which side of the fence one is on – pro-bigger blocks or not concerned about it – it is impossible to deny the transaction fee remains so small there no particular need to change anything just yet. However, we must also plan for the future, and take a spike in Bitcoin transactions into account so the network can scale, rather than face congestion.

Source; Reddit

Images credit 1,2

If you liked this article follow us on Twitter @themerklenews and make sure to subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest bitcoin and altcoin price analysis and the latest cryptocurrency news.

JP Buntinx

JP Buntinx is a FinTech and Bitcoin enthusiast living in Belgium. His passion for finance and technology made him one of the world's leading freelance Bitcoin writers, and he aims to achieve the same level of respect in the FinTech sector.

Share
Published by
JP Buntinx

Recent Posts

Standard Chartered and Coinbase Deepen Institutional Crypto Partnership

Standard Chartered and Coinbase are pushing their institutional crypto relationship into a new phase. On…

1 day ago

OKX Breaks Silence on MANTRA Incident as Evidence Points to Coordinated Market Manipulation

OKX has issued a detailed public statement addressing the events surrounding the MANTRA (OM) market…

1 day ago

Ethereum Proposes ERC-8092 to Solve Onchain Identity Fragmentation

Ethereum is preparing a deep structural upgrade. Not to gas fees. Not to throughput. To…

2 days ago

Pyth Network Activates Token Buybacks as Real Revenue Crosses $1M ARR

Pyth Network is taking a decisive step toward sustainable value accrual. The oracle network announced…

3 days ago

Tether Makes €1B Play for Juventus , Exor Shuts the Door

Tether has made one of the boldest moves yet by a crypto-native company into legacy…

3 days ago

10 Trusted Cloud Mining Platforms to Earn Free Bitcoin Daily in 2026

  Cloud mining continues to gain massive traction as 2026 inches closer. In tough economic…

3 days ago