Categories: CryptoNews

Segregated Witness Merge Request Sparks New Debate Among Bitcoin users

Segregated Witness has been touted as the proper solution to solving the Bitcoin block size problem. The Bitcoin Core developers have thoroughly tested the solution and recently merged it with the Bitcoin Core development branch on GitHub. A release for the updated client was not provided at this time, though.

Segregated Witness Is Coming Soon

Bitcoin enthusiasts have been waiting for the release of Segregated Witness for quite some time now. Solving the Bitcoin block size problem should have been done many months ago, and the process has taken longer than expected. Initially, developers assumed the solution would be ready by April 2016.

Unfortunately, that did not happen, albeit hardly anyone will complain about the more thorough testing of this solution. Then again, a delay by several months has caused the community to sit through another round of network congestion about a week ago. Now that the merge request has been approved, things are shifting into the next gear, though.

The Bitcoin community on Reddit is not sharing the enthusiasm of the developers, though. Some people feel that Segwit is such a massive change to the protocol architecture that it technically does not resemble Satoshi’s creation anymore. While the supply cap of Bitcoin is not impacted by Segwit, it is not unlikely that situation may change through a similar soft fork in the future. Albeit this may sound unrealistic, one cannot discount the possibility either.

Related Post

Moreover, there are some questions as to whether or not a real currency test should be performed before integrating Segregated Witness into Bitcoin. Charlie Lee, the creator of Litecoin, has indicated he would like to port SegWit to LTC in the future. Testing it in that environment might be a good idea as it can give Bitcoin Core devs valuable feedback and work out any remaining bugs or kinks.

Segregated Witness has turned into something more than a solution to solve the Bitcoin block size debate, though. Several malleability vulnerabilities are addressed as part of this implementation. But several Reddit users are not too happy with this solution in general. Caution is a positive thing, and thorough testing through a different currency may not be a bad idea.

Images credit 1,2

If you liked this article follow us on Twitter @themerklenews and make sure to subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest bitcoin and altcoin price analysis and the latest cryptocurrency news.

JP Buntinx

JP Buntinx is a FinTech and Bitcoin enthusiast living in Belgium. His passion for finance and technology made him one of the world's leading freelance Bitcoin writers, and he aims to achieve the same level of respect in the FinTech sector.

Share
Published by
JP Buntinx

Recent Posts

Hyperliquid Proposes 37M HYPE Burn as Validators Prepare to Vote

Hyperliquid is facing one of its most consequential governance moments yet. A proposal now before…

2 days ago

Tether Introduces PearPass, a Local-First Password Manager With No Servers

Tether has entered a new category. The company announced the launch of PearPass, a peer-to-peer…

2 days ago

Solana Takes First Steps Toward Quantum-Resistant Security

The Solana ecosystem is beginning to prepare for a future many in crypto still treat…

3 days ago

Institutional Bitcoin Accumulation Enters a New Phase

Bitcoin accumulation is no longer subtle. It’s visible. It’s deliberate. And it’s accelerating. In the…

3 days ago

Ripple Expands RLUSD to Layer 2 Networks, Laying the Groundwork for Institutional DeFi

Ripple is pushing its stablecoin strategy beyond a single chain. The company has announced it…

3 days ago

Standard Chartered and Coinbase Deepen Institutional Crypto Partnership

Standard Chartered and Coinbase are pushing their institutional crypto relationship into a new phase. On…

4 days ago