Privacy Invasion Becomes The New Norm Among Landlords And Employers

People applying for a new job are well aware of how companies conduct background checks before making their final decision. However, employers are now going through information provided by applicants’ social media accounts as well, albeit they do not necessarily want to access those accounts. That may be about to change, though.

Tenant Assured Is Invading Privacy

What makes Tenant Assured an intriguing and worrisome company is how they can access social media accounts belonging to applicants. To be more precise, the company will ask users to be granted access, rather than use any illegal means to do so. In a way, this makes the company a privacy invader, even though they dos o with consent from the account owner.

The service can work with Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and LinkedIn profiles, from which data is scraped over time. Given the fact a lot of people do not maintain a professional nature on most of these networks, the algorithm could uncover some negative information. The information called ranges from life events to connections, and interests to previous employment. A score is then issued based on the information it receives.

Albeit this solution is only available to landlords right now, but the overarching company – Score Assured – will launch a version for employers shortly. Some people will feel this is an invasion of privacy, but co-founder Steven Thornhill waves those concerns away. He feels that people living an ordinary life have nothing to worry about.

Related Post

But what is of real concern is how the company does not necessarily disclose the exact information it collects, or how the score is calculated based on these details. While it is true that most people have nothing to hide on social media, that does not mean enterprises should access those details freely.

What is even more disconcerting is how Tenant Assured does not let tenants see their own reports or make corrections. Even though technology enthusiasts would argue algorithms are nearly impeccable, there is always an error margin which could make the difference between “yes” and “no.” We can only hope these types of background checks do not become the norm, but it looks like this will be inevitable.

Source: Sophos

Images credit 1,2

If you liked this article follow us on Twitter @themerklenews and make sure to subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest bitcoin and altcoin price analysis and the latest cryptocurrency news.

JP Buntinx

JP Buntinx is a FinTech and Bitcoin enthusiast living in Belgium. His passion for finance and technology made him one of the world's leading freelance Bitcoin writers, and he aims to achieve the same level of respect in the FinTech sector.

Share
Published by
JP Buntinx

Recent Posts

Polymarket Natively Integrated With The Bitget Wallet As AI Tools Integrates Prediction Market

In a major development, Bitget Wallet has announced the integration of Polymarket directly into its…

6 hours ago

Aave Freeze Sparks Immediate Exit of $274M

The Aave rsETH/wrsETH market froze abruptly, leading to a rapid series of withdrawals, including one…

10 hours ago

Strategy Increases Bitcoin Holdings With $2.54B Record Purchase

Last week saw major investment firm Strategy Inc. (MSTR) bust into the crypto world with…

1 day ago

Bitmine Sets Record In Weekly ETH Purchase, Ramping Up 101,627 ETH In Just Seven Days

One of Bitmine Immersion Technologies came out to be the most aggressive in its cryptocurrency…

1 day ago

Three Major Exchanges Investigate RAVE Accusations of Market Manipulation

The RAVE controversy is now one of the most significant market integrity matters in recent…

2 days ago

RAVE Token Turmoil Deepens As Manipulation Allegations Trigger Investigation, Sharp Price Drop, And Community Backlash

A shocking turn of events followed on the cryptocurrency market when on-chain analyst zachxbt took…

3 days ago