Privacy Invasion Becomes The New Norm Among Landlords And Employers

People applying for a new job are well aware of how companies conduct background checks before making their final decision. However, employers are now going through information provided by applicants’ social media accounts as well, albeit they do not necessarily want to access those accounts. That may be about to change, though.

Tenant Assured Is Invading Privacy

What makes Tenant Assured an intriguing and worrisome company is how they can access social media accounts belonging to applicants. To be more precise, the company will ask users to be granted access, rather than use any illegal means to do so. In a way, this makes the company a privacy invader, even though they dos o with consent from the account owner.

The service can work with Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and LinkedIn profiles, from which data is scraped over time. Given the fact a lot of people do not maintain a professional nature on most of these networks, the algorithm could uncover some negative information. The information called ranges from life events to connections, and interests to previous employment. A score is then issued based on the information it receives.

Albeit this solution is only available to landlords right now, but the overarching company – Score Assured – will launch a version for employers shortly. Some people will feel this is an invasion of privacy, but co-founder Steven Thornhill waves those concerns away. He feels that people living an ordinary life have nothing to worry about.

Related Post

But what is of real concern is how the company does not necessarily disclose the exact information it collects, or how the score is calculated based on these details. While it is true that most people have nothing to hide on social media, that does not mean enterprises should access those details freely.

What is even more disconcerting is how Tenant Assured does not let tenants see their own reports or make corrections. Even though technology enthusiasts would argue algorithms are nearly impeccable, there is always an error margin which could make the difference between “yes” and “no.” We can only hope these types of background checks do not become the norm, but it looks like this will be inevitable.

Source: Sophos

Images credit 1,2

If you liked this article follow us on Twitter @themerklenews and make sure to subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest bitcoin and altcoin price analysis and the latest cryptocurrency news.

JP Buntinx

JP Buntinx is a FinTech and Bitcoin enthusiast living in Belgium. His passion for finance and technology made him one of the world's leading freelance Bitcoin writers, and he aims to achieve the same level of respect in the FinTech sector.

Share
Published by
JP Buntinx

Recent Posts

Ethereum Names Its Post-Glamsterdam 2026 Upgrade: Hegota

Ethereum developers have officially named the network’s post-Glamsterdam 2026 upgrade Hegota. The name merges two…

3 days ago

TRON Integrates With Kalshi, Bringing TRX and USDT to the World’s Largest Prediction Market

TRON is pushing deeper into real-world financial infrastructure. TRON has announced that Kalshi, the world’s…

3 days ago

Former Pump.fun Developer Sentenced to Six Years After $2M SOL Heist

The “crypto Robin Hood” story has reached its legal end. A London court has sentenced…

3 days ago

NEAR Goes Live on Solana as Cross-Chain Trading and AI Ambitions Accelerate

$NEAR is now live on Solana. And the implications go far beyond a simple token…

4 days ago

Bitcoin Rips to $90K, Then Slips as Leverage and Supply Collide

Bitcoin moved fast. Then it pulled back just as quickly. A sudden surge pushed BTC…

4 days ago

Hyperliquid Proposes 37M HYPE Burn as Validators Prepare to Vote

Hyperliquid is facing one of its most consequential governance moments yet. A proposal now before…

5 days ago