Categories: CryptoNews

Is BitGo To Blame For The Bitfinex Bitcoin Theft?

In light of the recent Bitfinex attack, BitGo revealed a rather interesting statement. The company claimed their own investigation has yielded no evidence of a breach of any of their servers during the Bitfinex attack. This is rather strange, as all of the missing funds was drained from multisignature wallets, which should be secured by BitGo’s technology.

A Rather Worrisome Scenario For BitGo?

The way most people look at this statement is as follows: BitGo secures BitFinex’s cold storage but did not record a breach. However, the funds were stolen from multisignature wallets. If there was no breach, to begin with, how did the funds go missing then? A rather worrisome option to consider for sure.

While no one is saying Bitfinex is not to blame for this hack, it also goes to show BitGo may not be as secure as most people assumed at first. The company specializes in doing one job, yet some people feel they utterly failed at doing just that. Some people even go as far as referring to this incident as “allowing customers to implement a solution that allows for theft”. If this is something that can be legally proven, BitGo may find themselves in hot waters very soon.



This matter becomes more intriguing when taking into account how every Bitfinex transaction has to be co-signed by BitGo. If their service was not breached, it is unlikely their private key was issued to steal the funds. This leaves very few other options on the table, albeit one should not exclude an inside job either at this stage.

Related Post

What is perhaps even more worrisome is how there does not seem to be any trace of the stolen funds. No one has been able to find out the specific transaction yet at this stage. Moreover, this makes it impossible to determine where the funds are going. Said information may be revealed at a later date, though.

But there is more, as some Twitter users are wondering what limits BitGo has implemented for multisignature withdrawals. A total sum of nearly 120,000 Bitcoin in one transaction is rather significant, and can hardly be warranted by any legitimate action. Large withdrawals such as those should raise plenty of red flags for BitGo, yet for some reason, the company did not find this request unusual.

Image credit 1

If you liked this article follow us on Twitter @themerklenews and make sure to subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest bitcoin and altcoin price analysis and the latest cryptocurrency news.

JP Buntinx

JP Buntinx is a FinTech and Bitcoin enthusiast living in Belgium. His passion for finance and technology made him one of the world's leading freelance Bitcoin writers, and he aims to achieve the same level of respect in the FinTech sector.

Share
Published by
JP Buntinx

Recent Posts

Starknet Introduces STRK20 To Bring Built-In Privacy To ERC-20 Tokens

The team behind Starknet has introduced a new token standard aimed at solving one of…

2 days ago

Meta Acquires Moltbook, A Social Network Built For AI Agents To Interact And Coordinate

In a move that highlights the growing race to build infrastructure for autonomous artificial intelligence,…

2 days ago

Polymarket Partners With Palantir To Develop AI Platform For Sports Betting Integrity

Prediction market platform Polymarket has entered a new partnership with Palantir Technologies and artificial intelligence…

2 days ago

Ethereum Foundation Begins Staking Treasury ETH Using Bitwise Infrastructure

The Ethereum Foundation has begun staking part of its treasury, marking a significant step in…

3 days ago

Cyberconnect And SurfAI Founder Reportedly Under Investigation In China

Fresh reports circulating in the crypto space suggest that Wei Jiequan, better known as Wilson…

3 days ago

Virtuals And dAI Launch ERC-8183 To Enable Trustless Agentic Commerce On Ethereum

The infrastructure powering autonomous AI agents on Ethereum is slowly coming together. Payments, trust layers,…

3 days ago