FTC Settles Charges Against Bitcoin Mining Hardware Manufacturer Buttlefly Labs

Bitcoin mining hardware manufacturer Butterfly Labs, has agreed to settle a dispute with the FTC, which accused the company of deceiving customers. According to the FTC’s complaint – which was filed on the 18th of September in 2014 – Butterfly Labs misrepresented the profitability of their mining machines, and also kept customer’s pre-payments without delivering the mining hardware for an extend period of time.

According to an official press release on the FTC website, the settlement bars Butterfly Labs, and its owner Sonny Vleisides, from taking pre-payments for any bitcoin hardware that can not be delivered within 30 days. General manager of Butterfly Labs, Darla Drake, is also under the same constraints.

Jessica Rich, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, said that this settlement will ensure that the defendants will not be able to mislead customers in the future.

Under the settlement, Butterfly Labs will also be required to obtain permission from customers in the event of a late delivery.

“Both settlement orders in the case require the defendants to provide consumers with prompt refunds if they sell a damaged or defective product, and require defendants to obtain a consumer’s permission before delivering a product late.”

Although the court imposed monetary penalties of $38,615,161 against Butterfly Labs, the judgements have been suspended for the time being due to the inability of the defendants to pay them. Instead, a $15,000 payment is required of BL, and a $4000 payment is required of Sonny Vleisides.

Related Post

The $135,8878 judgement against Darla Drake – who used customer’s hardware to mine for herself – will be suspended once she returns the dollar equivalent of all the bitcoins that were mined with that hardware.

While the monetary penalties are suspended for the time being, the FTC has made it clear that the situation may change if any other evidence surfaces.

“The judgments were suspended based on the defendants’ inability to pay, but will become due should the defendants be found to have misrepresented their financial condition.”

 

Image credit: 1

If you liked this article follow us on Twitter @themerklenews and make sure to subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest bitcoin and altcoin price analysis and the latest cryptocurrency news.

Traderman

Avid blogger, entrepreneur, and cryptocurrency enthusiast. I love writing about cryptocurrency, NFTs, price analysis, and much more!

Share
Published by
Traderman

Recent Posts

Starknet Introduces STRK20 To Bring Built-In Privacy To ERC-20 Tokens

The team behind Starknet has introduced a new token standard aimed at solving one of…

2 days ago

Meta Acquires Moltbook, A Social Network Built For AI Agents To Interact And Coordinate

In a move that highlights the growing race to build infrastructure for autonomous artificial intelligence,…

2 days ago

Polymarket Partners With Palantir To Develop AI Platform For Sports Betting Integrity

Prediction market platform Polymarket has entered a new partnership with Palantir Technologies and artificial intelligence…

2 days ago

Ethereum Foundation Begins Staking Treasury ETH Using Bitwise Infrastructure

The Ethereum Foundation has begun staking part of its treasury, marking a significant step in…

3 days ago

Cyberconnect And SurfAI Founder Reportedly Under Investigation In China

Fresh reports circulating in the crypto space suggest that Wei Jiequan, better known as Wilson…

3 days ago

Virtuals And dAI Launch ERC-8183 To Enable Trustless Agentic Commerce On Ethereum

The infrastructure powering autonomous AI agents on Ethereum is slowly coming together. Payments, trust layers,…

3 days ago