Categories: CryptoNews

Core Vs. Classic Discussion Grows Stale

Things have been relatively quiet on the Bitcoin Node front as of late, and the initial mind shift seems to have stalled. Although there is still a high number of Bitcoin Classic nodes on the network to this very date, very little has changed in the past week and a half. Bitcoin Classic Blocks mined on the network are stagnating as well.  At this rate, reaching a 75% networking hashpower threshold will be quite difficult.

Also read: Igot Bitcoin Exchange Is On The Brink of Collapse

The Bitcoin Network Stalemate

After the initial success Bitcoin Classic had managed to gather, things have stagnated in more recent times by the look of things. With no increase in the number of Bitcoin blocks mined, reaching a 75% miner consensus on the network seems to be an impossible achievement. Bitcoin Core remains in the lead by quite the margin, as over 93% of the entire hashrate is pointed at those particular mining pools.

What is of grave concern is how the number of Bitcoin Classic mining pools does not seem to be increasing either. KnCMiner, F2pool, and Slush pool are the only mining pools discovering Classic blocks on the network, and this has not changed for quite some time now. Rather worrying for Bitcoin Core supporters, as everything seems to be working for Bitcoin Core right now.

Related Post

Although Bitcoin miners have the free choice of switching mining pools depending on which block size solution they prefer, very few seems to be actively doing so. Whether this is a sign of declining interest in Bitcoin Classic, or a lot of people looking at others to make the first move, remains to be seen. But if nothing changes sooner rather than later, it sounds like the Bitcoin Core implementation will “win” by default.

Additionally, talks have quieted down by quite a margin regarding the ongoing block size debate as of late. Community members exhibit a state of resignation, rather than excitement or active commitment to come to a solution. But this is also a positive thing, as it gives developers more time to hammer away at their preferred block size solution, rather than to deal with community questions and allegations.

Source: Coin Dance

Images credit 1,2

If you liked this article follow us on Twitter @themerklenews and make sure to subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest bitcoin and altcoin price analysis and the latest cryptocurrency news.

JP Buntinx

JP Buntinx is a FinTech and Bitcoin enthusiast living in Belgium. His passion for finance and technology made him one of the world's leading freelance Bitcoin writers, and he aims to achieve the same level of respect in the FinTech sector.

Share
Published by
JP Buntinx

Recent Posts

Ethereum Names Its Post-Glamsterdam 2026 Upgrade: Hegota

Ethereum developers have officially named the network’s post-Glamsterdam 2026 upgrade Hegota. The name merges two…

2 days ago

TRON Integrates With Kalshi, Bringing TRX and USDT to the World’s Largest Prediction Market

TRON is pushing deeper into real-world financial infrastructure. TRON has announced that Kalshi, the world’s…

2 days ago

Former Pump.fun Developer Sentenced to Six Years After $2M SOL Heist

The “crypto Robin Hood” story has reached its legal end. A London court has sentenced…

2 days ago

NEAR Goes Live on Solana as Cross-Chain Trading and AI Ambitions Accelerate

$NEAR is now live on Solana. And the implications go far beyond a simple token…

3 days ago

Bitcoin Rips to $90K, Then Slips as Leverage and Supply Collide

Bitcoin moved fast. Then it pulled back just as quickly. A sudden surge pushed BTC…

3 days ago

Hyperliquid Proposes 37M HYPE Burn as Validators Prepare to Vote

Hyperliquid is facing one of its most consequential governance moments yet. A proposal now before…

3 days ago