The topic of privacy and encryption is still being kicked around by government officials these days. Notably the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police is for forcing users to decrypt their communication and devices. The CACP voted to support legal changes which would permit judges to “compel encryption key holders” to reveal it to law enforcement.
It is not the first, nor the last time; law enforcement agencies want to compel users into decrypting sensitive data. These stories have been circulating for quite some time now, and they will continue to do for the foreseeable future. While it is true criminals operate online in an anonymous manner, decrypting those tools is not the answer to solving crimes.
Canadian law currently offers no provision for legally demand suspects to provide passwords or encryption keys during an investigation. While the CACP is for creating such a law, privacy advocates will oppose the concept at every turn. As they rightfully should, since law enforcement has no business in tracking anyone’s online communication.
As was to be expected, the CACP cited an internal report arguing how law enforcement has a harder time lawfully accessing and examining digital evidence. That doesn’t justify demanding a law that will force anyone to decrypt their information, though, as it would only lead to more consumer privacy violations. Then again, that seems to suit law enforcement agencies around the world just fine, as they could not care less about individual privacy.
It did not take long for the first pushback to occur. This proposal has been labelled as “wildly disproportionate” by OpenMedia spokesperson David Christopher. Although user privacy is not a constitutional right by any means, there should be no legal precedent for invading anyone’s privacy based on a hunch. If there is no substantial evidence against someone, law enforcement agencies should have no grounds to ask for decryption keys either.
Finding a balance between respecting user privacy and solving cyber crime will be a difficult task. Then again, one could argue law enforcement is too quickly resorting to less legal matters to obtain the evidence they need. Perhaps it is time to rethink the whole strategy regarding cyber crime and rebuild it from the ground up, rather than demanding invasion privacy laws.
Image credit 1
If you liked this article follow us on Twitter @themerklenews and make sure to subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest bitcoin and altcoin price analysis and the latest cryptocurrency news.
Bitwise Asset Management has just made its first move into tokenized funds, and it comes…
Binance just made a move that blurs the line between crypto exchange and traditional brokerage…
NEAR Protocol has had a month that most blockchain projects would stretch across an entire…
Something is becoming increasingly clear about Chainlink, the integrations are not slowing down. The protocol…
Blockchain investigator ZachXBT has flagged a major stablecoin freeze that is sending shockwaves through the…
From a primarily interest rate swap niche product, Exponent has developed into an onchain capital…