Vitalik Buterin Calls For A Reset In Decentralized Social

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin says decentralized social media is poised for a comeback in 2026, arguing that the failure of earlier crypto social experiments was not technical, but philosophical.

In a series of remarks shared publicly, Vitalik makes it clear that crypto social lost its way by prioritizing speculative tokens and short-term incentives over meaningful communication, content quality, and healthy online interaction.

According to Vitalik, the core promise of decentralized social has always been about building better tools for mass communication. But instead of focusing on identity, reputation, privacy, and social context, many projects treated token launches as innovation itself. The result was fragile ecosystems driven by price cycles rather than genuine communities.

Why Crypto Social Failed The First Time

Vitalik rejects the idea that crypto social failed because the technology was immature. In his view, the tools were already sufficient. What broke the model was incentive design. Many platforms optimized for growth through financial rewards, encouraging users to post, engage, and onboard primarily to farm tokens rather than contribute meaningful content.

This approach created artificial demand and short-lived hype cycles. Once token incentives dried up or prices collapsed, user activity declined sharply. Communities built on speculative rewards proved unable to sustain themselves. Vitalik argues that this misalignment pushed crypto social away from its original purpose: enabling healthier, more resilient digital spaces.

He draws a clear distinction between monetization that supports creators and monetization that creates bubbles. While mixing money and social interaction is not inherently wrong, he points out that many crypto projects rewarded pre-existing social capital rather than content quality. Over time, these token-driven systems failed, with most creator tokens collapsing in value within a year or two.

Decentralization As The Path Forward

For Vitalik, the next phase of decentralized social must start with first principles. A better society, he argues, requires better mass communication tools, systems that surface high-quality information, help users find common ground, and serve long-term user interests rather than maximizing short-term engagement.

There is no simple fix for these challenges, but Vitalik sees decentralization as the most important foundation. A shared data layer, combined with open competition at the client level, allows anyone to build new interfaces, moderation systems, and discovery mechanisms on top of the same social graph. This structure prevents monopoly control while encouraging experimentation and innovation.

Vitalik emphasizes that decentralization enables diversity in social experiences. Instead of everyone posting inside a single global information warzone, users can choose environments that reflect different values, norms, and interaction models. This, he believes, is how social platforms evolve beyond engagement-driven algorithms.

Lens, Farcaster, And The Return To Social-First Thinking

Vitalik expresses particular optimism about ecosystems like Lens and Farcaster, which he sees as examples of decentralized social projects that are refocusing on fundamentals. He praises the Aave team for stewarding Lens through its early stages and says he is excited about the next phase as new contributors take over who genuinely care about the “social” aspect.

He highlights that some of these teams were experimenting with encrypted tweets and privacy-preserving communication long before decentralized social became a trend. This long-term orientation, rather than short-term token engineering, is what gives him confidence in their future.

Notably, Farcaster has recently announced a shift from a social-first approach to a more wallet-driven model, signaling experimentation within the ecosystem. While this represents a change in direction, Vitalik still views Farcaster as a key player in the broader decentralized social landscape, especially as teams explore how identity and wallets intersect with social graphs.

Vitalik Is Already Back On Decentralized Social

Vitalik’s comments are not theoretical. He reveals that he has already returned to decentralized social in practice. Since the start of the year, every post he has written or read has been through firefly.social, a multi-client interface that aggregates platforms like X, Lens, Farcaster, and Bluesky.

This approach reflects his broader vision: users should not be locked into a single platform or client. Instead, they should be able to interact across networks while choosing the tools that best serve their needs. Firefly’s ability to bridge multiple social systems illustrates how decentralized infrastructure enables flexibility without fragmenting identity.

Vitalik says he plans to post more frequently on Lens this year and encourages others to explore decentralized social platforms. He frames this moment as a reopened frontier, an opportunity to experiment with new interaction models that move beyond the limitations of current social media.

Ethereum’s Growing Value Underscores The Shift

Vitalik’s renewed focus on decentralized social comes as Ethereum’s onchain fundamentals continue to strengthen. The total value locked across the Ethereum ecosystem has reached $341.5 billion, nearly 11 times Solana, 29 times BNB Chain, and 190 times Aptos, highlighting Ethereum’s dominance as the settlement layer for decentralized applications.

Despite this, Ethereum’s market price has lagged behind its intrinsic value. The network’s unmatched security, decentralization, and developer ecosystem continue to attract builders, capital, and innovation, even as price action remains subdued. This growing disconnect suggests that Ethereum’s real economic value is outpacing market sentiment.

For long-term participants, this period represents a structural transition rather than a decline. As Ethereum matures, attention is shifting away from pure speculation toward applications that deliver real utility, including decentralized identity, communication, and social coordination.

A Decisive Moment For Decentralized Social

Vitalik frames 2026 as a turning point. Decentralized social is not about recreating Web2 platforms with tokens attached. It is about rethinking how online communication works from the ground up. That means prioritizing identity, reputation, privacy, and context over price charts and incentives.

He argues that decentralized social should be built by people who deeply care about solving social problems, not extracting value through financial engineering. The removal of speculative excess, while painful in the short term, creates space for platforms that can sustain meaningful interaction over decades.

As Ethereum’s infrastructure continues to mature and decentralized social tools evolve, Vitalik believes the conditions are finally aligning. The next generation of crypto social platforms may not chase virality or token pumps, but they may succeed where previous attempts failed by putting the “social” back into decentralized social.

Disclosure: This is not trading or investment advice. Always do your research before buying any cryptocurrency or investing in any services.

Follow us on Twitter @themerklehash to stay updated with the latest Crypto, NFT, AI, Cybersecurity, and Metaverse news!