Categories: EducationFAQ

Is There a Need For Bitcoin Regulation?

There is a lot of discussion regarding whether or not Bitcoin needs to be regulated. Cryptocurrency enthusiasts will say there is no requirement for doing so, whereas government officials and policymakers would like nothing more than to tightly regulate Bitcoin.

Innovation Should Not Be Put On A Tight Leash

Now that various countries in the world are focusing their attention on pushing FinTech innovation, it only seems normal they would take a more active approach towards Bitcoin and the blockchain. However, that does not necessarily appear to be the case, as many people still condemn Bitcoin for making financial services accessible to people all over the world without oversight or regulation.

There is a particular advantage to Bitcoin regulation, assuming it is done right and leaves enough room to keep on innovating. Proper and open-minded regulatory requirements will give Bitcoin more legitimacy, as the claims of cryptocurrency not being regulated would become moot. After all, something that is regulated can never be used for nefarious activities, right?

Moreover, some consumers may feel they need to be protected when it comes to Bitcoin, even though that is impossible by default. Since no one exerts control over finance, there is no one to offer protection, let alone customers who can benefit from hand-holding. Nor should there be, to be fair, as full control over finance has its perks and responsibilities.

Related Post

At the same time, too severe regulation will have an adverse effect. Companies in the US, who used to operate in New York, will remember the days of BitLicense, which forced a lot of them to stop offering their services in that region. Hopefully, that type of approach will be more of an exception rather than the norm.

In the end, it all comes down to how regulatory frameworks will look like, and what they are trying to achieve. Exchanges complying with more thorough user documentation and verification might be somewhat acceptable, but it will be a fine balancing act. Linking identities to Bitcoin wallet addresses and transactions, on the other hand, should never be discussed to begin with.

Source: News Tip Via Email

Images credit 1.2

If you liked this article follow us on Twitter @themerklenews and make sure to subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest bitcoin and altcoin price analysis and the latest cryptocurrency news.

JP Buntinx

JP Buntinx is a FinTech and Bitcoin enthusiast living in Belgium. His passion for finance and technology made him one of the world's leading freelance Bitcoin writers, and he aims to achieve the same level of respect in the FinTech sector.

Share
Published by
JP Buntinx

Recent Posts

SEC Approves First Spot Chainlink ETF For U.S. Markets

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has approved Bitwise’s spot Chainlink ETF, marking the first…

2 days ago

Rumble And Tether Launch Integrated Self-Custodial Wallet

Rumble and Tether have officially launched the Rumble Wallet, a self-custodial crypto wallet integrated directly…

2 days ago

BNB Chain Sets Fermi Hard Fork For January 14 Upgrade

BNB Chain is preparing to activate its Fermi hard fork on January 14 at 2:30…

2 days ago

Ethereum Ends 2025 As The Financial And Coordination Layer Of The Internet

Ethereum closes 2025 having firmly established itself as the secure foundation for an expanding digital…

3 days ago

Solana Closes 2025 As A Revenue-Driven Blockchain

Solana ends 2025 as one of the few blockchain ecosystems where revenue, assets, and trading…

3 days ago

Morgan Stanley Enters Crypto ETF Race With Bitcoin And Solana Filings

Morgan Stanley has taken a decisive step into the regulated crypto investment market, filing its…

3 days ago