Airdrop manipulation fears are back on the table. According to onchain analytics platform Bubblemaps, more than 60% of aPriori’s APR airdrop on BNB Chain was claimed by a single entity using roughly 14,000 linked wallets.
The project, which previously raised $30 million, launched its APR token on October 23 and quickly surged to a $300 million market cap. But behind the hype, a complex web of wallets appears to have quietly drained the airdrop, leaving the community demanding answers.
A $30M Project, a $300M Token, and a Questionable Airdrop
aPriori positioned itself as one of the most anticipated projects building on the Monad ecosystem, a high-performance Layer 1 chain set to launch soon.
Ahead of Monad’s mainnet release, aPriori distributed 12% of its total APR supply via an airdrop on BNB Chain, a move meant to reward early supporters and boost community engagement.
The launch seemed like a success.
$APR trading went live on October 23, liquidity ramped up fast, and the market cap hit $300 million within days.
But then, Bubblemaps’ analysis dropped.
14,000 Wallets. One Entity.
Bubblemaps revealed a pattern that suggests one coordinated actor may have claimed a majority of the airdrop supply.
Their report showed around 14,000 wallets linked through transactional patterns and funding behavior. Each wallet received a small amount of 0.001 BNB, just enough to pay gas fees, all within extremely tight time windows.
Those wallets then went on to claim APR from the airdrop contract and transfer the tokens to new, freshly created addresses, forming what analysts describe as a clustered multi-layer network of wallets.
Bubblemaps shared a visualization showing thousands of these wallets connected in a spiderweb-like structure, with transactions flowing through a few key nodes, all suggesting centralized control.
“These wallets were newly funded from Binance, received identical amounts of BNB, and transferred $APR in synchronized patterns,” Bubblemaps reported.
Funding From Binance Raises Eyebrows
One of the most striking findings was that all the wallets in question were funded directly from Binance.
Each address received a tiny amount of BNB, 0.001, from Binance hot wallets, often within seconds of each other. This funding pattern, combined with uniform activity, makes it statistically unlikely that they belong to separate individuals.
Instead, it points toward automated activity, possibly executed by scripts or bots that were able to bypass aPriori’s Sybil resistance mechanisms.
The fact that these wallets were created so close together, funded from the same source, and performed identical transactions adds weight to suspicions of a coordinated exploit of the airdrop system.
The Entity Is Still Active
Bubblemaps also noted that the suspicious activity hasn’t stopped.
Even after the initial report, the same entity appears to continue funding new wallets, claiming more APR, and transferring tokens to secondary addresses.
In short, the operation is still ongoing.
That ongoing movement raises major questions:
How were these wallets able to qualify for the airdrop in the first place?
Was it a loophole in the eligibility criteria, or did someone gain inside knowledge about how the filters worked?
At the time of writing, aPriori has not commented on the findings. Requests for comment from the project team went unanswered.
This project raised $30M from tier-1 VCs
But 60% of its airdrop was claimed by one entity via 14,000 addresses
What’s going on with @aPriori? 🧵 pic.twitter.com/QIaLSUgHY5
— Bubblemaps (@bubblemaps) November 11, 2025
Community Reacts: “Decentralized” or Deceptive?
The aPriori community was quick to react.
Some users voiced frustration, saying that the airdrop had been compromised before it even reached legitimate supporters.
Others speculated that a bot farm or a sophisticated airdrop farmer had found a way around the project’s verification system.
The optics are bad for a project that had built hype around decentralization and fairness.
aPriori’s silence has only fueled the criticism.
With no official statement or explanation from the team, traders are left wondering how a project that raised $30M could overlook such a major exploit in its token distribution mechanics.
Airdrops Under Scrutiny Again
This isn’t the first time a major Web3 project has faced controversy over airdrop farming.
Similar patterns have appeared in past distributions, where clusters of linked wallets drained large portions of rewards meant for organic users.
Even with advanced Sybil detection tools, onchain airdrops remain vulnerable to sophisticated farming techniques, especially when eligibility is based on loosely verifiable criteria like wallet activity or token holdings.
The problem is becoming systemic.
Each new incident erodes trust in the fairness of token launches, and community members are increasingly demanding transparent post-mortems when these exploits occur.
Why It Matters for Monad and aPriori
The controversy lands at a critical time.
aPriori is supposed to be one of Monad’s flagship launches, serving as an example of the type of projects the network aims to attract, high-performance, innovative, and community-driven.
Instead, it now faces questions about governance, transparency, and technical oversight.
If the airdrop was compromised, it could lead to a concentration of tokens in the hands of one actor, potentially distorting governance, liquidity, and token economics before Monad’s mainnet even goes live.
Such centralization risks could undermine confidence not just in aPriori, but in Monad’s ecosystem narrative as well.
No Word from the Team, Yet
As of now, aPriori has made no public statement addressing the findings.
There has been no clarification on whether the team is investigating the incident, nor any indication that they plan to revoke or blacklist the affected tokens.
For now, onchain data remains the only source of truth, and it paints a clear picture:
Thousands of wallets, acting in unison, pulled off one of the largest airdrop consolidations seen in months.
Until the team breaks its silence, the community is left to speculate on how such a massive breach of fairness could happen under the radar.
A Case Study in Airdrop Exploitation
The aPriori situation could become a case study in airdrop vulnerability.
It underscores how even well-funded projects with strong backers can fall victim to coordinated exploitation.
Whether the root cause lies in human oversight, flawed design, or sophisticated automation, one thing is certain:
The line between “community incentive” and “exploit opportunity” is thinner than ever.
Conclusion
aPriori’s $APR launch was supposed to be a milestone, a prelude to Monad’s high-speed future. Instead, it’s now at the center of a growing onchain mystery.
With over 60% of its airdrop allegedly claimed by one entity, the project faces a serious credibility test.
Unless the team steps forward to clarify what went wrong, and how they plan to fix it, this incident could become a lasting reminder of how fragile airdrop fairness can be in the age of automation and anonymity.
Disclosure: This is not trading or investment advice. Always do your research before buying any cryptocurrency or investing in any services.
Follow us on Twitter @themerklehash to stay updated with the latest Crypto, NFT, AI, Cybersecurity, and Metaverse news!
